Re: Installed 2.0 to SS4 ...
mat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Jima wrote: > I tried it on one with 48mb of RAM; suffice it to say it didn't go > so well. Hopefully I'll get the one with 96mb back soon so I can > try it out. good lord, my poor old LX only has 32Mb of RAM so it really is going to be hard work. has anyone even tried installing 2.0 on something as ancient as a SS1/SS2? as nobody answered last time, can i check again: am i mad, or are there no official kernel updates since the stock 2.6.13-1.1603? and another question: jima, what is this "~2.1 (beta)" that you so interestingly mention? - -- [email protected] | www.fsck.no-ip.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEyo8R3nxx0MO2o1sRChZmAJ4rTKVGfRqOi143TkpE91W3zoq/+QCcDrXg r2kn/XPFiCvaBPDuN0bGK3A= =m/ZG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html