Re: How stable is corona compared to 2.0?
Dennis Gilmore <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:54:04 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Once upon a time Wednesday 25 July 2007, Scot P. Floess wrote: > I just got my hands on an Ultra 10 and am considering putting corona on > it...but note its not a complete port of FC6 yet... Should I stick with > 2.0 and wait? Or is corona "good enough?" I'm toying with the idea of > using the Ultra 10 as my main server... > > Thanks! Corona has been very stable for me. grab the 2.99 isos in the corona tree Dennis _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html