Re: How stable is corona compared to 2.0?

"Scot P. Floess" <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:58:34 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.aurora.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Awesome - thanks!

So, how much more needs to be done to complete 3.0?

Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Once upon a time Wednesday 25 July 2007, Scot P. Floess wrote:
>   
>> I just got my hands on an Ultra 10 and am considering putting corona on
>> it...but note its not a complete port of FC6 yet...  Should I stick with
>> 2.0 and wait?  Or is corona "good enough?"  I'm toying with the idea of
>> using the Ultra 10 as my main server...
>>
>> Thanks!
>>     
>
> Corona has been very stable for me.  grab the 2.99 isos in the corona tree
>
> Dennis
>
>   

-- 
Scot P. Floess
27 Lake Royale
Louisburg, NC  27549

252-478-8087 (Home)
919-754-4592 (Work)

Chief Architect JPlate  http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate
Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html