Using an Ultra 5 as an NFS server - bad performance?
"Scot P. Floess" <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:24:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All: I just recently converted my Ultra 5 into my NFS server. Sometimes I see errors from NFS clients about the server not responding (the server being my Ultra 5)... One thing I note that seems to run terribly is pulling Firefox off an NFS mount and the users home dir being on the same NFS mount... Sometimes Firefox can take over 60 secs to start (sometimes longer)... Additionally, if I run Firefox from a local drive using a local user - its starts up in 5 sec or less... If I run Firefox from a local drive for a user who's home directory is NFS mounted - again it takes a similarly bad amount of time for Firefox to start up... I've seen talk about the U5's IDE controller being terrible so I am wondering if maybe I /*should not*/ use it as an NFS server. When I was using my PIII 550 Mhz as the NFS server I didn't encounter any of these performance issues... I don't want to "falsely" accuse my U5 - but my experience shows me it must be the U5... Thanks, Scot -- Scot P. Floess 27 Lake Royale Louisburg, NC 27549 252-478-8087 (Home) 919-754-4592 (Work) Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html