Re: Confound It @ MemberDB :)
"David Lloyd" <lloy0076-t0RjpzUORie6c6uEtOJ/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Craige, Actually, the point to the source was in reference to another person (NOT ME) wondering how the current code works; one can tell by inference that I know it doesn't work the way I might want it to. That said, we could patch the code such that it had a myriad of voting systems such that depending on which one was chosen (and it could be chosen after the election) depended on who got elected. We could then "sell" this open source system to various "democratic governments in the world" who seem to operate on "democratic elections so long as I can retrospectively change the voting system such that I win" type democracies. It would be a winner, open source and I'm sure we could gain some real finance to do it! DSL > -----Original Message----- > From: Craige McWhirter [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2016 1:48 PM > To: David Lloyd <lloy0076-t0RjpzUORie6c6uEtOJ/[email protected]>; 'Linux Australia' <linux- > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] Confound It @ MemberDB :) > > On 11/01/16 21:26, David Lloyd wrote: > > > I am tempted to alter the code to allow "equal preferences", eg: > > Stewart may not have been cheeky enough but I am: > > https://launchpad.net/memberdb > > Patch away! > > :-D > > > -- > Craige McWhirter > M: +61 4685 91819 > W: https://mcwhirter.com.au/