Re: Confound It @ MemberDB :)

On 12/01/16 14:07, David Lloyd wrote:

> That said, we could patch the code such that it had a myriad of voting 
> systems such that depending on which one was chosen (and it could be 
> chosen after the election) depended on who got elected. We could then 
> "sell" this open source system to various "democratic governments in the 
> world" who seem to operate on "democratic elections so long as I can 
> retrospectively change the voting system such that I win" type 
> democracies.

I'm not familiar with the code but comments from those who are made it
quite clear that memberdb would need some non-trivial re-factoring and
that similar effort could result in a voting module being added to free
software CMS.

*Then* it could be used around the world ;-)

-- 
Craige McWhirter
M: +61 4685 91819
W: https://mcwhirter.com.au/

_______________________________________________
linux-aus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=BMqB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----