Re: On Perspective

Kathy Reid <kathy-T0dd/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.australia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Couldn't agree more. Thoughtful, reflective and as always encouraging us 
to be our collective best.
Thanks Hugh.

On 07/06/16 17:06, ac wrote:
> hear hear
>
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:55:04 +1000
> Matthew Cengia <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I think "perspective," "constructive," "volunteers," and "importance"
>> are the key words I take from this email. I don't think there's
>> anything I can say that you haven't already articulated, Hugh. Well
>> done. To all LA volunteers.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Hugh Blemings <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I confess a degree of regret on having to write this and that the
>>> matter of the VPAC events have taken the turn they have.
>>>
>>> For that matter I also dearly wish more of our membership would
>>> reflect on whether the email they're about to send will move the
>>> commons of Linux and Free/Open Source Software forward, or merely
>>> make them feel better in the moment.
>>>
>>> In this I do not refer alone to the current threads on the Linux-aus
>>> mailing list but rather the general trend over nearly two decades
>>> for an undue percentage of the traffic on the linux-aus list to be
>>> griping/trolling and then - often left to volunteers - defending
>>> actions, justifying decisions and so forth.
>>>
>>> This latter all too often _literally_ consuming hours of discussion,
>>> debate and checking to ensure a measured and appropriate response or
>>> solution to the crisis du jour.
>>>
>>> And so to perspective...
>>>
>>> Linux Australia and its membership do fantastic and, often,
>>> important work.  Much of it is unseen, most of the time things done
>>> right, fun is had, code is written, people learn new things, a
>>> career is started, perhaps even a career advanced and so forth.
>>> All great stuff.  Also, for most of us, the sole motivation for
>>> being involved as volunteers.
>>>
>>> But I'm struck that we sometimes lose perspective about the
>>> importance, in the grander scheme of things, of what we do.
>>>
>>> To start, I was, frankly, a bit annoyed that our infrastructure went
>>> offline precipitously but upon hearing the full story, once our
>>> very able admin team had extinguished most of the fires, this
>>> annoyance all but dissipated entirely.
>>>
>>> But the thing that really allowed me, for want of a better term, to
>>> find peace with the situation was the realisation that actually -
>>> it didn't really matter.
>>>
>>> Nobody died, no one lost revenue, no LA events were dramatically
>>> impacted.  What we do is fantastic, important and useful, but it
>>> isn't (and probably shouldn't) be _mission critical_.
>>>
>>> This is not to say for a moment that we shouldn't take our
>>> responsibilities or the work undertaken seriously, but rather that
>>> we should weigh the matter at hand in a broader light.
>>>
>>> Please - reflect and decide if an email that will ultimately come
>>> down to the criticism of an organisation, a team or an individual
>>> is warranted, or could perhaps be written in a more constructive
>>> tone.
>>>
>>> Last time I checked we were, at the end of the day, trying to
>>> accomplish largely the same set of fantastic, important and fun,
>>> but probably not mission critical things...  Perhaps then space to
>>> allow our interactions online and in person to better reflect these
>>> shared goals ?
>>>
>>> Thank you for reading,
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Hugh Blemings
>>> President, Linux Australia
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-aus mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.