Re: On Perspective
ac <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Organization | WnD |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hear hear On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:55:04 +1000 Matthew Cengia <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I think "perspective," "constructive," "volunteers," and "importance" > are the key words I take from this email. I don't think there's > anything I can say that you haven't already articulated, Hugh. Well > done. To all LA volunteers. > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Hugh Blemings <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I confess a degree of regret on having to write this and that the > > matter of the VPAC events have taken the turn they have. > > > > For that matter I also dearly wish more of our membership would > > reflect on whether the email they're about to send will move the > > commons of Linux and Free/Open Source Software forward, or merely > > make them feel better in the moment. > > > > In this I do not refer alone to the current threads on the Linux-aus > > mailing list but rather the general trend over nearly two decades > > for an undue percentage of the traffic on the linux-aus list to be > > griping/trolling and then - often left to volunteers - defending > > actions, justifying decisions and so forth. > > > > This latter all too often _literally_ consuming hours of discussion, > > debate and checking to ensure a measured and appropriate response or > > solution to the crisis du jour. > > > > And so to perspective... > > > > Linux Australia and its membership do fantastic and, often, > > important work. Much of it is unseen, most of the time things done > > right, fun is had, code is written, people learn new things, a > > career is started, perhaps even a career advanced and so forth. > > All great stuff. Also, for most of us, the sole motivation for > > being involved as volunteers. > > > > But I'm struck that we sometimes lose perspective about the > > importance, in the grander scheme of things, of what we do. > > > > To start, I was, frankly, a bit annoyed that our infrastructure went > > offline precipitously but upon hearing the full story, once our > > very able admin team had extinguished most of the fires, this > > annoyance all but dissipated entirely. > > > > But the thing that really allowed me, for want of a better term, to > > find peace with the situation was the realisation that actually - > > it didn't really matter. > > > > Nobody died, no one lost revenue, no LA events were dramatically > > impacted. What we do is fantastic, important and useful, but it > > isn't (and probably shouldn't) be _mission critical_. > > > > This is not to say for a moment that we shouldn't take our > > responsibilities or the work undertaken seriously, but rather that > > we should weigh the matter at hand in a broader light. > > > > Please - reflect and decide if an email that will ultimately come > > down to the criticism of an organisation, a team or an individual > > is warranted, or could perhaps be written in a more constructive > > tone. > > > > Last time I checked we were, at the end of the day, trying to > > accomplish largely the same set of fantastic, important and fun, > > but probably not mission critical things... Perhaps then space to > > allow our interactions online and in person to better reflect these > > shared goals ? > > > > Thank you for reading, > > > > Kind Regards, > > Hugh Blemings > > President, Linux Australia > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-aus mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus > > > > >