Re: GAR versus BBC

Nick Moffitt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bbc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
begin  Adam Sampson  quotation:
> I think this is the point at which I wave in a friendly manner at the
> GAR developers, since I've spent the last year or so building and
> actively maintaining a desktop Linux system based on a modified
> version of GAR. In general, it works beautifully; GAR's a really nice
> ports system for this sort of thing.

	That's wonderful!  I may spend some time working on a Links
page that lists all of the other people using GAR for things!

> There's some information and a snapshot of my ports tree available at
> <http://offog.org/code/garstow.html>. The version of GAR I used has
> diverged somewhat from the original; some of my patches (to cope with
> new archive formats, checking archive PGP signatures, and so on) might
> be of interest to upstream GAR, whereas stow support probably isn't.

	Actually, I originally tried to wrangle Sneakums into the
project by begging for stow support, but it was the LVM/RAID stuff
that actually brought him in.  I'd love to see GAR support stow and
its compatriots!

> GARstow currently contains 541 packages, many of which should work in
> plain GAR or GARnome with only minor modification:
> <http://offog.org/code/garstow-packages.html>

	Wow!  That's spectacular!  Beaujolais!

-- 
Support your droogs!

end
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.