Re: GAR versus BBC
Nick Moffitt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bbc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
begin Adam Sampson quotation: > I think this is the point at which I wave in a friendly manner at the > GAR developers, since I've spent the last year or so building and > actively maintaining a desktop Linux system based on a modified > version of GAR. In general, it works beautifully; GAR's a really nice > ports system for this sort of thing. That's wonderful! I may spend some time working on a Links page that lists all of the other people using GAR for things! > There's some information and a snapshot of my ports tree available at > <http://offog.org/code/garstow.html>. The version of GAR I used has > diverged somewhat from the original; some of my patches (to cope with > new archive formats, checking archive PGP signatures, and so on) might > be of interest to upstream GAR, whereas stow support probably isn't. Actually, I originally tried to wrangle Sneakums into the project by begging for stow support, but it was the LVM/RAID stuff that actually brought him in. I'd love to see GAR support stow and its compatriots! > GARstow currently contains 541 packages, many of which should work in > plain GAR or GARnome with only minor modification: > <http://offog.org/code/garstow-packages.html> Wow! That's spectacular! Beaujolais! -- Support your droogs! end