Re: using bluez without the dbus-daemon, just dbus-lib as peer-to-peer connection
Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Mon, 19 May 2008 10:52:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bluez.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1211187168.13248.0.camel@californication> |
Hi Fritz, > dbus can be used in two modes, on the one hand just the dbus library > in order to establish a point-to-point communication between two > processes, > on the other hand with the dbus-daemon which uses the library in order > to allow the communication of many different processes with each > other. > > In my specific scenario I have to safe system resources since I'm > developing for an embedded arm system and I only have one single > application which has to communicate with bluez. > > Is it possible to use bluez only with the dbuslib (without > dbus-daemon) in order to establish a point-to-point communication > between bluez and an application which uses the bluez/bluetooth > features? > If yes which part of bluez is responsible for doing that? > Are there any differences in the view of bluez-functionalities between > this two modes of communication besides the obvious that there can be > only one peer-to-peer connection? the answer is no, you can't do that. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/