Re: using bluez without the dbus-daemon, just dbus-lib as peer-to-peer connection

Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Mon, 19 May 2008 10:52:48 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bluez.user
Message-ID <1211187168.13248.0.camel@californication>
Hi Fritz,

> dbus can be used in two modes, on the one hand just the dbus library
> in order to establish a point-to-point communication between two
> processes,
> on the other hand with the dbus-daemon which uses the library in order
> to allow the communication of many different processes with each
> other.
> 
> In my specific scenario I have to safe system resources since I'm
> developing for an embedded arm system and I only have one single
> application which has to communicate with bluez.
> 
> Is it possible to use bluez only with the dbuslib (without
> dbus-daemon) in order to establish a point-to-point communication
> between bluez and an application which uses the bluez/bluetooth
> features?
> If yes which part of bluez is responsible for doing that?
> Are there any differences in the view of bluez-functionalities between
> this two modes of communication besides the obvious that there can be
> only one peer-to-peer connection?

the answer is no, you can't do that.

Regards

Marcel



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/