Re: [PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes

HI all,

Please forgive the additional incorrect patches sent, the patch I meant to send
was the first one:
[PATCH] tc: make CBQ support optional and isolate legacy code

I was having issues with building for RISC-V with a newer kernel (>=6.3).
Please include it if you find it useful.

I'm a big fan of the busybox project, thanks for all the great work!

Regards,
--Victor


On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 12:07 PM Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> El El mar, 21 abr 2026 a las 20:35, Roberto A. Foglietta <[email protected]> escribió:
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 19:24, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > El El mar, 21 abr 2026 a las 16:54, Roberto A. Foglietta <[email protected]> escribió:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 12:23, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia via busybox
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Victor,
>> >> >
>> >> > This patch is already included in git. I assume you did not mean to send it ?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> My interpretation of sending that patch is: the git.busybox.net
>> >> changed during a period of downtime, therefore some people did not
>> >> accept that
>> >
>> >
>> > It is simpler than that. He’s sending a patch that is not his own, and is taken from git HEAD. Probably a mistake with git format-patch or similar.
>> >
>>
>> Irrelevant, because he sent a patch of his own as well
>
>
> Of course but obviously I am not talking about that one. I simply warned him that he had sent an additional patch that was already in git.
>
> Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
> [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox