Re: [PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia via busybox <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:29:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.busybox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABDcavZbf0AUbFOqn=Qb=EEJwuDjEWzf57kyc_DA_gWjeb4t-g@mail.gmail.com> |
El El mar, 21 abr 2026 a las 21:19, Roberto A. Foglietta < [email protected]> escribió: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 21:07, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I simply warned him that he had sent an additional patch that was > already in git. > > Sure, and we warned you that THE git isn't necessarily the one you > would like to be. There is no “the git I would like to be”. I am talking about the official upstream repository. Or do you mean we should all be talking about your fork instead? Cheers, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia [email protected] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox