Re: [PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes

Hi Charles!

> Now, I say this as someone with zero official contributions to busybox
> (who only joined this list relatively recently to try and upstream
> some changes I had made locally and have received no traction on), but
> I think you are the one coming in with off topic post hoc
> rationalizations rambling about git being down and this being some way
> of legitimizing a patch and changes happening in snapshots etc when in
> fact there has been no trouble accessing the official git via the CLI
> and it remains the authoritative upstream source. While I agree it
> would be nice to see more engagement from the maintainers and webhosts
> of the project on this list, that is outside of all of our control.

The problem is that in the absence of Denys this mail list was de
facto hijacked by Roberto who sprang into action as a pseudo
maintainer collecting patches without any review and without declaring
an official fork.

Though I see https://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox-cvs/2026-April/thread.html
that Denys has committed thrice in April which gives us hope that he
is alive and ok. But on this mail list he stopped writing on March
22nd.

-- 
With best regards
  Maksim Dmitrichenko