Re: [PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes

Hi Maksim,

El El jue, 23 abr 2026 a las 22:30, Maksim Dmitrichenko via busybox <
[email protected]> escribió:

> Hi Charles!
>
> > Now, I say this as someone with zero official contributions to busybox
> > (who only joined this list relatively recently to try and upstream
> > some changes I had made locally and have received no traction on), but
> > I think you are the one coming in with off topic post hoc
> > rationalizations rambling about git being down and this being some way
> > of legitimizing a patch and changes happening in snapshots etc when in
> > fact there has been no trouble accessing the official git via the CLI
> > and it remains the authoritative upstream source. While I agree it
> > would be nice to see more engagement from the maintainers and webhosts
> > of the project on this list, that is outside of all of our control.
>
> The problem is that in the absence of Denys this mail list was de
> facto hijacked by Roberto who sprang into action as a pseudo
> maintainer collecting patches without any review and without declaring
> an official fork.
>
> Though I see
> https://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox-cvs/2026-April/thread.html
> that Denys has committed thrice in April which gives us hope that he
> is alive and ok.


In fact the last two commits are from yesterday. These add a link to a
GitHub mirror in the busybox website, and modify the “Browse source” link
to point to that mirror. Which means that Denys is probably aware of the
problems with the web frontend of git.busybox.net.

Best,

Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox