RE: Naming convention ?
"Moshe Bar" <moshe-ay74M1d3r6RWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Carl You wrote it, you name it. :-) Moshe -----Original Message----- From: openmosix-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org [mailto:openmosix-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Carl Radford (DC0854-IT) Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:54 AM To: openmosix-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Subject: [Openmosix-devel] Naming convention ? If this "omd" daemon thing for 2.6 kernels is going to be publicly available in the future it ought to have a suitable name "before" it is released. Is there some sort of naming convention in use ? If not I propose that it is called something like omumigd - openmosix userspace migration daemon I had already copied the om kernel concept of a version string of three digits "0.0.0" comments and suggestions please..... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642