Re: [Patch] Do not crash upon remote-remote migration
tab-mTI/[email protected] (Vincent Hanquez)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 01:52:33PM -0400, Goncalo Abecasis wrote: > If I can throw in my two cents, I think it would be better to have > Ansgar's than to disable remote-to-remote migration as Tab suggests. It is > a very useful feature and there are a lot of us out here eager to have a > useable (if not perfect) 2.6 out. The remote-to-remote is not disabled, it has NEVER been implemented in 2.6. Implementing workaround for something that's not even mandatory to have something working is a bad idea. When we will have a working set of base features (missing execve so far), maybe I'll reconsider... but now that's totally premature. What will make 2.6. useable is that any migratable task is totally able to complete on the remote node. anyway, you're free to apply the patch on your tree before compiling ... Cheers, -- Vincent Hanquez ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642