Re: [Patch] Do not crash upon remote-remote migration

Okay -- sounds like the consensus of all the people who know better than 
me is that it is not the right time for this R2R patch. Goncalo

On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Vincent Hanquez wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 01:52:33PM -0400, Goncalo Abecasis wrote:
>> If I can throw in my two cents, I think it would be better to have
>> Ansgar's than to disable remote-to-remote migration as Tab suggests. It is
>> a very useful feature and there are a lot of us out here eager to have a
>> useable (if not perfect) 2.6 out.
>
> The remote-to-remote is not disabled, it has NEVER been implemented in
> 2.6.
>
> Implementing workaround for something that's not even mandatory to have
> something working is a bad idea. When we will have a working set of base
> features (missing execve so far), maybe I'll reconsider... but now that's
> totally premature.
>
> What will make 2.6. useable is that any migratable task is totally able
> to complete on the remote node.
>
> anyway, you're free to apply the patch on your tree before compiling ...
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Vincent Hanquez
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642