Re: om2.6 What's currently showable ?

I thought somebody had taken ownership of the round-robin scheduler? Wasn't
it Evan?

Moshe
 

-----Original Message-----
From: openmosix-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
[mailto:openmosix-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Matt Dew
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: openmosix-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Openmosix-devel] om2.6 What's currently showable ?

Goutnet,
   The todo page looks much nicer than what I threw up. (no pun intended.
:))

Thanks for doing that.  
Also, is there any way to put some times/dates on the pages so people have
an idea of relativity?
Matt

On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 15:37 +0000, Florian Delizy  wrote:
> Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 03:49:21PM +0200, Florian Delizy wrote:
> >   
> >> Well actually, that's the case ... If I choose to use the 2.6
kernel, 
> >> [CUT]
> > Mmap is very complex syscall and very wide:
> > - Anonymous private mmap is working already very well (that is the
simplest)
> > - File private mmap use to work, with the rinode thingie. not sure
that's
> >   still the case now .. not tested for a while as well.
> > - Anonymous shared mmap are not suppose to work yet, and should send
> >   back the process to the deputy. untested.
> > - File shared mmap are not suppose to work either. untested
> >
> > all shared mmaping can be made to work though. with some read only 
> > mapping to catch write fault, and have handler to
propagate
> > stuff.. the performance now is another thing ..
> >
> >   
> ok, I added that to the todolist as well
> 
> http://openmosix.snarc.org/wakka.php?wiki=ToDo
> 
> >> This choice is quite important to me, and moreover, I can only help

> >> continuing to develop oM if I can proove the feasability with oM2.6
> >>     
> >
> > OM on 2.6 is definitely feasible. A experienced developer full time
on
> > it should complete it in few weeks I guess.
> >
> >   
> >> I am not sure that would be enough ... though ... I guess that
programs 
> >> that we have to migrate are something like, using a shared lib, now
the 
> >> question is how would taht be done ... (I don't know yet). A simple

> >> scenario, if several programs are using a single shared lib, and
all 
> >> programs are spread over different cluster nodes, would that work ?
> >>     
> >
> > yes it definitively works. a shared lib is anyway a private mapping
(or
> > a shared mapping over non-writable stuff, which is the same as
private).
> >
> >   
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn
cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> openMosix-devel mailing list
> openMosix-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's
Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT &
business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
openMosix-devel mailing list
openMosix-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV