Re: om2.6 What's currently showable ?

Matt Dew wrote:
> Goutnet,
>    The todo page looks much nicer than what I threw up. (no pun
> intended. :))
>
>   
no problem, I find it easier to read that way ;)

> Thanks for doing that.  
> Also, is there any way to put some times/dates on the pages so people
> have an idea of relativity?
>   
Well, yes what date would be usefull ? the potential completion time ? 
or the start date ?

> Matt
>
> On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 15:37 +0000, Florian Delizy  wrote:
>   
>> Vincent Hanquez wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 03:49:21PM +0200, Florian Delizy wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Well actually, that's the case ... If I choose to use the 2.6
>>>>         
> kernel, 
>   
>>>> [CUT]
>>>>         
>>> Mmap is very complex syscall and very wide:
>>> - Anonymous private mmap is working already very well (that is the
>>>       
> simplest)
>   
>>> - File private mmap use to work, with the rinode thingie. not sure
>>>       
> that's
>   
>>>   still the case now .. not tested for a while as well.
>>> - Anonymous shared mmap are not suppose to work yet, and should send
>>>   back the process to the deputy. untested.
>>> - File shared mmap are not suppose to work either. untested
>>>
>>> all shared mmaping can be made to work though. with some
>>> read only mapping to catch write fault, and have handler to
>>>       
> propagate
>   
>>> stuff.. the performance now is another thing ..
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> ok, I added that to the todolist as well
>>
>> http://openmosix.snarc.org/wakka.php?wiki=ToDo
>>
>>     
>>>> This choice is quite important to me, and moreover, I can only help
>>>>         
>
>   
>>>> continuing to develop oM if I can proove the feasability with oM2.6
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> OM on 2.6 is definitely feasible. A experienced developer full time
>>>       
> on
>   
>>> it should complete it in few weeks I guess.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> I am not sure that would be enough ... though ... I guess that
>>>>         
> programs 
>   
>>>> that we have to migrate are something like, using a shared lib, now
>>>>         
> the 
>   
>>>> question is how would taht be done ... (I don't know yet). A simple
>>>>         
>
>   
>>>> scenario, if several programs are using a single shared lib, and
>>>>         
> all 
>   
>>>> programs are spread over different cluster nodes, would that work ?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> yes it definitively works. a shared lib is anyway a private mapping
>>>       
> (or
>   
>>> a shared mapping over non-writable stuff, which is the same as
>>>       
> private).
>   
>>>   
>>>       
>>
>>     
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>>     
> share your
>   
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn
>>     
> cash
>   
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> openMosix-devel mailing list
>> openMosix-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-devel
>>     
>
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV