Re: OpenMOSIX process migration mechanism
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If the node can be expected to run no more than one or two processes at a time, which would be the better system with less processor overhead? Sounds to me like 2.4. is less overhead for the nodes. The head node is the one that would benefit from 2.6. Am I reading that correctly? Also, I want the owner of the node to be able to go to a website, click on a link and get connected to their choice of project to donate time to. That would probably involve a URL such as: "PROTOCOL://nn.nn.nn.nn#PORT" I'm not sure which protocol to use, or how to pass it to oM. Any suggestions? > ... > Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:33:40 -0600 > From: "Matt Dew" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Openmosix-devel] OpenMOSIX process migration mechanism > ... > Hi Irfan, > Under the covers they are quite different. 2.4 has each process > maintaining its own comm socket between deputy (home) and remote. > > 2.6 has a kernel daemon, kcomd, that manages all communications. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642