Re: OpenSSI status question
"Stan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of James P. Kinney III > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:03 AM > To: Watson, Brian J. (HP Labs) > Cc: John Hughes; ssic-linux-devel; Walker, Bruce J (HP-Labs) > Subject: Re: [SSI-devel] OpenSSI status question > > It is back up and available now. Thanks for looking into this. > John, thanks for the rsync link. > > Now to look at x86_64, kernel 2.6.18 and CentOS 5 (and forget about > sleeping) .... > Hello James, The CenOS 5 port is moving along at the speed of a single person; more heads/hands would certainly help. Current status: merged openSSI code into 2.6.18 code base (base .18 chosen for Fedora Core 6 drop?). Diffs between 2.6.18 & CentOS(2.6.18.8) manageable as heavy lifting done for 2.6.18. working towards a clean compile - exposing blanks to fill in. TBD: Debug under Fedora Core 3 (R1.9.2/3) system - delays some of the user-land porting? merge 2.6.18.8 diffs for CentOS 5. Port openSSI user-level code/mods into CentOS 5 env. Test, test & more testing. John Hughes has done the x86_64 heavy lifting in the almost cooked openSSI R1.9.3. Where can you assist? Stan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/