Re: RPVPSOP_END typo bug
"Ramirez, Laura L" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <B4C2625036BD3E4CAE099E2E5BE35F9914049999@G3W0634.americas.hpqcorp.net> |
Hi Roger, If you are talking about "ret" being a typo. You are right for code correctness it should probably be "_ret". However, considering that all callers pass in "ret", functionally, comparing "ret" in the switch statement should still yield the same result. laura -----Original Message----- From: Roger Tsang [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 3:49 PM To: ssic-linux-devel Cc: Ramirez, Laura L Subject: RPVPSOP_END typo bug Hi, Looks like a typo in ssi-1.9 and affects quite a lot of VPROC. -Roger #define RPVPSOP_END(_ret,_error,_id_string) \ switch(ret) { \ case 0: \ break; \ case -EREMOTE: \ _error = -EREMOTE; \ break; \ default: \ printk("%s: bad rpc, ret=0x%x",_id_string,_ret);\ _error = -EREMOTE; \ break; \ } \ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/