Re: XEN+OpenSSI, big performace overhead?

"Roger Tsang" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Are you talking about the idea of partitioning a SSI cluster into
smaller SSI clusters?

Roger


On 8/3/06, Hugo Segura <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have talking with a friend about SSI clusters + XEN, then their view about
> it is:
>
> "Xen works below the kernel while SSI works at a much higher level in
> the kernel. Xen's main work is in virtualization management which is
> now supported at the processor level.
>
> Aggregating as a big system and partitioning will create big
> performance overhead and is inefficient.  Instead you can create
> multiple partitions with SSI interface itself if you work on
> hot-plug of systems which allows you to dynamically re-configure your
> partitions"
>
> What you think about?
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Hugo Segura
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ssic-linux-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.