Re: XEN+OpenSSI, big performace overhead?
"Roger Tsang" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Are you talking about the idea of partitioning a SSI cluster into smaller SSI clusters? Roger On 8/3/06, Hugo Segura <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have talking with a friend about SSI clusters + XEN, then their view about > it is: > > "Xen works below the kernel while SSI works at a much higher level in > the kernel. Xen's main work is in virtualization management which is > now supported at the processor level. > > Aggregating as a big system and partitioning will create big > performance overhead and is inefficient. Instead you can create > multiple partitions with SSI interface itself if you work on > hot-plug of systems which allows you to dynamically re-configure your > partitions" > > What you think about? > > Best regards, > > > Hugo Segura > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > Ssic-linux-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV