Re: Apt-rpm's future....
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:54:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.conectiva.apt-rpm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:48:41PM -0400, Gary Greene wrote: > > For a single distro where repository-mixing isn't the intention, I'd > > suggest yum. > If we must move to smart, we will, but yum/up2date/urpmi is not an option > that the PhoeNUX devel team are interested in. I guess I'm just joining in and I'm not sure of all of the history involved in your situation, but if your intention is to find a replacement for apt-get, I you'll find going to yum a more direct (almost-drop-in) replacement. That's what we did for our BU Linux distribution, and we've been really happy (especially now with the sqlite backend). Not dissing smartpm, which is cool and all. And it can certainly coexist with yum. It's just a very different approach, and one which really focuses on the problems related to mixing repositories. -- Matthew Miller [email protected] <http://mattdm.org/> Guen, 8 months and counting ----> <http://guen.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>