Re: Inching towards new release...
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Mar 2006 12:22:23 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.conectiva.apt-rpm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1301615315== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6e7ZaeXHKrTJCxdu" Content-Disposition: inline --6e7ZaeXHKrTJCxdu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 03:06:25AM -0800, Panu Matilainen wrote: >=20 > Just uploaded a pre-version of next apt-rpm release: > http://laiskiainen.org/apt/testing/apt-0.5.15lorg3-pre1.tar.bz2 >=20 > The repomd branch has now been merged to trunk and the repomd support is= =20 > feature complete to the extent I have in mind for the initial release [1]= .=20 > All functionality is supposed to be back in place both with old apt=20 > repositories and repomd and any mix-and-match combination of them,=20 > anything else is a bug that should be reported. Oh and it now understands= =20 > repomd source repositories as well [2]. >=20 > I'm expecting to do one or two more pre-releases to tidy things up a bit= =20 > and shake out any remaining bugs (surely there are some), so now is a goo= d=20 > time to put it to some heavyweight testing :) Thanks! > [1] I'm not planning to add resolving file dependencies from filelists.xm= l=20 > to the initial repomd-support release. IIRC there was some statistics that had 97% of some FC release in the past not needing filelists.xml. This still leaves 3% breaking if filelists.xml is not considered. Unfortunately I don't know which packages are involved. For a release officially supporting repo-md I think the filelists.xml support should be part of it, but release early, release often is always a better plan. How about tagging repo-md support as a preview feature if filelists.xml support doesn't make it? > [2] Repositories such as Fedora Core 2-4 release trees containing both=20 > binary and source information might cause some weird behavior when used a= s=20 > repomd-src and are best avoided, I'll hope to fix that for the final=20 > version. --=20 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net --6e7ZaeXHKrTJCxdu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEHT7vQBVS1GOamfERAv86AKCZe+/L/aUM8e+Syxx/U6mdnuXorQCfUxJT oJi/gfE2hKmFvkD8nHWr+M4= =5qLA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6e7ZaeXHKrTJCxdu-- --===============1301615315== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ apt-rpm mailing list [email protected] http://distro2.conectiva.com.br/mailman/listinfo/apt-rpm --===============1301615315==--