Re: reform-tools_1.82-2~bpo13+1_both.changes REJECTED

Hi Martin,

Am 5. Dezember 2025 17:43:26 MEZ schrieb Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]>:
>Quoting Micha Lenk (2025-12-05 16:01:20)
>> d/p/reform-power-daemon.patch certainly is a good idea, but it isn't
>> mentioned in debian/changelog. Please document all the changes you did in
>> debian/changelog.
>
>I don't understand the above. The top changelog for my upload looks like this:
>
>  1 reform-tools (1.82-2~bpo13+1) trixie-backports; urgency=medium
>  2
>  3   * Rebuild for trixie-backports.
>  4
>  5  -- Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]>  Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:50:37 +0100

Only in case you had no modifications except adding the d/changelog entry, your entry would have been complete like this, but...

>  7 reform-tools (1.82-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>  8
>  9   * enable and start reform-power-daemon by default upon installation and
> 10     upgrade
> 11
> 12  -- Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]>  Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:22:34 +0100
>
>The topmost entry mentions the rebuild for backports and the one below is the
>entry about reform-power-daemon. What is the problem?

... d/p/reform-power-daemon.patch was showing up in the debdiff output without being mentioned in d/changelog.

Regards,
Micha