Re: Proposal: Mesa 25.3.3 backport for trixie-backports

On Sun, Jun 14, 2026, at 9:22 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 6/13/26 15:00, stornic56 wrote:
>> 4. Mesa 26.0.8 is extra work
>
> not really[0].
>
> a mesa backport[1] is itself a simple rebuild (no changes needed),
> if the following packages are backported too:
>
>    * llvm-toolchain-21
>      => simple rebuild, no changes necessary

that one is already in backports cause of rustc. I do plan on doing
another sync with Forky.

> [..]

>    * spirv-llvm-translator-21
>    * spirv-tools
>    * spirv-headers
>      => simple rebuilds, no changes necessary
>         (at least one of them could probably avoided, but not worth the
>         effort)

if that is planned, I'd wait for it and then do the llvm update, since
it would allow reducing the delta ;)

Fabian