Re: Considerations for lilo removal
"s. keeling" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Were you using pico to post this? What an ugly piece of @#$% it produces! Don't use it for mail! Top-posted, mis-spellings, blank lines, ugly Content-crap sprinkled everywhere, sheesh. And an html section too (elided)! Bonus! :-P The evidence: Brooks R. Robinson <[email protected]>: > ------=_Part_4053_3065530.1213901799187 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > > How many times do I have to tell you people. The ONLY TRUE editor in pico > (or nano at the very least). Everything else is bloatware. Oh, and by the > way: The onyl true language is C. If you can't do it in C, then it can't > (or shouldn't) be done. > > On 6/19/08, Bernd Zeimetz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Geez. You guys get this wrong all the time. The right tool for the > > > right job! If you think vi(m) / emacs would be best at it, rock on. > > > It's all up to you. > > > > No. Even if emacs would be better, you should use vim. > > > > > Me, I use both of the real true editors, and enjoy them for their > > > respective strengths. > > > > That's evil! > > > > > And as apps go, emacs isn't the bloated hawg it once was. That's kde > > > and gnome now. Though (g)vim's attempting to get there too. > > > > KDE is to gome like vim is to emacs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------=_Part_4053_3065530.1213901799187 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > > How many times do I have to tell you people. The ONLY TRUE editor in pico (or nano at the very least). Everything else is bloatware. Oh, and by the way: The onyl true language is C. If you can't do it in C, then it can't (or shouldn't) be done.<br> > <br> [snip] > > ------=_Part_4053_3065530.1213901799187-- > > -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.