Re: Considerations for lilo removal
"s. keeling" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bernd Zeimetz <[email protected]>: > > > Geez. You guys get this wrong all the time. The right tool for the > > right job! If you think vi(m) / emacs would be best at it, rock on. > > It's all up to you. > > No. Even if emacs would be better, you should use vim. Editor zealotry, so '80s. > > Me, I use both of the real true editors, and enjoy them for their > > respective strengths. > > That's evil! Q.E.D. Say, maybe it's evil to even converse with an emacs user. That makes YOU evil too! You dirty unwashed thing, you. > > And as apps go, emacs isn't the bloated hawg it once was. That's kde > > and gnome now. Though (g)vim's attempting to get there too. > > KDE is to gome like vim is to emacs. Use Fluxbox, and you'll have plenty left for emacs. I'll never use those two again. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.