TR: Re: Should we rename sid to lotso?
"Thomas Harding" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Don't know if followup works on my client... proprietary toys are evil too. Subject: Re: Should we rename sid to lotso? From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen) Date: 2010-07-14 19:35 >On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote: >> No more "Sid" in Toys Story 3! The new wicked who wants break >> the toys is a jumbo, pink teddy bear named "Lots-O'-Huggin Bear": > >http://www.pixar.com/featurefilms/ts3/lotso.html >> >> Should we rename sid to lotso ? :-) > Sid broke toys. Unstable is where developers break their toys in Debian. > Lotso didn't break toys himself, he just put them in places where toddlers > destroyed toys. Not quite the same thing. Maybe moving sid repository, while change it's name to lotso, on a "google instance site", will state it in foo-bear situation Evily dangerous, no? > > -- > Len Sorensen Cheers, Thomas Harding -- note: foobar is primarily a battle situation acronym