Re: TR: Re: Should we rename sid to lotso?
Martin Bähr <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:42:34AM +0200, Thomas Harding wrote: > >> Should we rename sid to lotso ? :-) > > Sid broke toys. Unstable is where developers break their toys in Debian. > > Lotso didn't break toys himself, he just put them in places where toddlers > > destroyed toys. Not quite the same thing. > Maybe moving sid repository, while change it's name to lotso, > on a "google instance site", will state it in foo-bear situation sid is the repo, packages are the toys. packages get uploaded by devs, and placed into the repo by ftp-master. packages get broken in the repo. who placed them there? ftp-master hence: ftp-master is lotso! greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix searching contract jobs: programming, training and administration - anywhere -- pike programmer working in china community.gotpike.org foresight developer (open-steam|caudium).org foresightlinux.org unix sysadmin iaeste.at realss.com Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.at/~mbaehr/ is.schon.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]