Re: DPA instead of PPA
Justin B Rye <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jacob Wilk wrote: > * Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]>, 2013-05-09, 08:38: >>> I actually really like this idea! (Though I suggest "Debian Personal >>> Archive".) >>> >>> It's really different from what people know as PPAs. >> >> To be fair, "Personal" is probably not relevant either. I expect many >> of those repositories to be maintained by teams. >> >> DSPA = Debian Special Purpose Archive >> DSPR = Debian Special Purpose Repository >> DASP = Debian Archive of Special Packages >> SPA = Special Package Archive > > You forgot the most catchy: > > DSA = Debian Special Archive Or a portmanteau instead of an initialism: SUP(plementary re)POSITORY. -- JBR DSA is debian-sys-anal, right?