Re: DPA instead of PPA
Arnt Karlsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Organization | ..ing.Arnt.Karlsen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 9 May 2013 12:40:28 +0100, Justin wrote in message <[email protected]>: > Jacob Wilk wrote: > > * Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]>, 2013-05-09, 08:38: > >>> I actually really like this idea! (Though I suggest "Debian > >>> Personal Archive".) > >>> > >>> It's really different from what people know as PPAs. > >> > >> To be fair, "Personal" is probably not relevant either. I expect > >> many of those repositories to be maintained by teams. > >> > >> DSPA = Debian Special Purpose Archive > >> DSPR = Debian Special Purpose Repository > >> DASP = Debian Archive of Special Packages > >> SPA = Special Package Archive > > > > You forgot the most catchy: > > > > DSA = Debian Special Archive > > Or a portmanteau instead of an initialism: SUP(plementary re)POSITORY. ...and the Optional SOUP... ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.