Re: ITP: mpi-defaults -- Meta-packages depending on appropriate MPI -dev and -bin packages for each platform

Manuel Prinz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.science,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.beowulf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 09:05 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> I think we should put either debian or mpi first. How about 
> 
>           mpi-default-{dev,bin}
> 
> or even
> 
>           mpi-debian-default-{dev,bin}
> 
> to make it even clearer that it is just 'us' (ie Debian) defining a default
> for us, rather misconstruing that more than two decades (I'm guessing) of
> competing mpi implementations have ended ? ;-)

Good guessing. But I'm confident we can solve that problem in one way or
another in a shorter time frame.

> Comments ?

Well, why not debian-default-mpi-{bin,dev}? ;)

Seriously, I do not care that much. A name is a name. If we're lucky,
the package might be gone by release of Squeeze.

Best regards
Manuel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkklOJoACgkQ8WlhyMyNeVdOPwCeNgoRg7HDn0PATvj1PDdHjybt
DFUAn1Nj1UTcBrtthdFKLQaZoF5806n5
=b+G0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.