Re: ITP: mpi-defaults -- Meta-packages depending on appropriate MPI -dev and -bin packages for each platform
Manuel Prinz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.science,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.beowulf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 09:05 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> I think we should put either debian or mpi first. How about
>
> mpi-default-{dev,bin}
>
> or even
>
> mpi-debian-default-{dev,bin}
>
> to make it even clearer that it is just 'us' (ie Debian) defining a default
> for us, rather misconstruing that more than two decades (I'm guessing) of
> competing mpi implementations have ended ? ;-)
Good guessing. But I'm confident we can solve that problem in one way or
another in a shorter time frame.
> Comments ?
Well, why not debian-default-mpi-{bin,dev}? ;)
Seriously, I do not care that much. A name is a name. If we're lucky,
the package might be gone by release of Squeeze.
Best regards
Manuel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkklOJoACgkQ8WlhyMyNeVdOPwCeNgoRg7HDn0PATvj1PDdHjybt DFUAn1Nj1UTcBrtthdFKLQaZoF5806n5 =b+G0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----