Re: ITP: mpi-defaults -- Meta-packages depending on appropriate MPI -dev and -bin packages for each platform
"Ondrej Certik" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.science,gmane.linux.debian.devel.beowulf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Manuel Prinz <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 09:05 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: >> I think we should put either debian or mpi first. How about >> >> mpi-default-{dev,bin} >> >> or even >> >> mpi-debian-default-{dev,bin} >> >> to make it even clearer that it is just 'us' (ie Debian) defining a default >> for us, rather misconstruing that more than two decades (I'm guessing) of >> competing mpi implementations have ended ? ;-) > > Good guessing. But I'm confident we can solve that problem in one way or > another in a shorter time frame. > >> Comments ? > > Well, why not debian-default-mpi-{bin,dev}? ;) > > Seriously, I do not care that much. A name is a name. If we're lucky, > the package might be gone by release of Squeeze. I like Dirk's suggestion more: mpi-default-{dev,bin} But as you said, a name is just a name. Thanks Adam for pushing this forward and everything you do for Debian. Ondrej