Bug#1077764: Ruling request on os-release specification implementation

Matthew Vernon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte
Message-ID <5b0e416b-db54-4192-ac9a-e5a0935e9310__18626.8168663204$1722940044$gmane$org@debian.org>
On 06/08/2024 11:22, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 11:10, Matthew Vernon <[email protected]>
> wrote:

>> The policy question of "should testing and unstable be
>> differentiated by os-release" isn't straightforward, and there
>> isn't consensus that the answer should be "yes", as you would like
>> it to be.

>> Debian's current (and long-standing) answer to that question is
>> "no", and my view is that you have not advanced a sufficiently
>> compelling case that this answer should be changed.
> 
> Sorry, I don't follow. How is that related to the implementation 
> details of how to solve it?

Well, because if the answer to the question is "no, testing and unstable 
should not be differentiated by os-release", then there is no need to 
come up with a system whereby they are differentiated.

Regards,

Matthew
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.