Bug#1077764: Ruling request on os-release specification implementation
Matthew Vernon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5b0e416b-db54-4192-ac9a-e5a0935e9310__18626.8168663204$1722940044$gmane$org@debian.org> |
On 06/08/2024 11:22, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 11:10, Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> > wrote: >> The policy question of "should testing and unstable be >> differentiated by os-release" isn't straightforward, and there >> isn't consensus that the answer should be "yes", as you would like >> it to be. >> Debian's current (and long-standing) answer to that question is >> "no", and my view is that you have not advanced a sufficiently >> compelling case that this answer should be changed. > > Sorry, I don't follow. How is that related to the implementation > details of how to solve it? Well, because if the answer to the question is "no, testing and unstable should not be differentiated by os-release", then there is no need to come up with a system whereby they are differentiated. Regards, Matthew