Bug#1065416: Bastian's offer in #1065416
Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <87h6bj23qs.fsf__35225.7481239334$1723867766$gmane$org@melete.silentflame.com> |
Hello kernel maintainers, In [1], Bastian proposes that Matthias <doko> take over the linux-libc-dev binary package, building it from one of the crossbuilding source packages he maintains. Different people have been reading Bastian's e-mail differently as to whether it was a serious proposal for how to resolve the dispute, or just a rhetorical device Bastian was using to make a point. In any case, doko is among those who took the offer seriously. In two messages written today, Bastian appears to say both that he is okay with resolving the dispute that way, and also that he is not. I am writing seeking some clarity. What is the team consensus on this? Is this something you are happy to do, would consider doing, or is it off the table? That would help us see where we are. Many thanks. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1065416#108 -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmbAIYsZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQOe1D/43ydmCmiMrrn9MdyqtbPT7 LPSwxTKg5aY3HwibB0B4TWcrhDOGu0MTetrF7mTOyRa56cEfEI5qCeYWhSmMlJEK sgmRhQVJN6sntXlz4+FRyKUQcXyKFdsA6k4n6krv/jsLZ9NbMXfnK6WMHS6SeUpW vrnIu3XdDUio26rFipRhGif4q+5/gRCba+L1aMRSWYA8nW+iFNOD6f4V4UbjoHtd whv8AGvwzpvO04sY4ZbS7XcPcbWrNsZuGtePsl0GsT5Q08BVIqYvUubOCgBRkCGS a41MfO0nlx+1ZjD+VORTXePm6Vy/80+nRGC3w0YDPSK8kWsWCCqpGc+6/HDIlgrd GOewmTcsqGV2eeh2kkcbP618ktuWLJ8YQCLlYbhxrfq/oOtbo3o4kU+tixRgb7Ql 1WFbV9ligsWhgaSg9eH6RZa4jF2ip/HtZvPLXEUY6FQ8t5/8aeilWmIQ6Lto+n0B NUI95LPk4LxaKLKLtHJ09jKBSamO1tfno2k/V8wmDOEq3Kph1RfebKyMl+Z2zAze 7uBZ4TxeMJr9bTDn0zUvnTVI2dOd5xy/Gji31FW458IDG5A95sAzBqagllKVOGlh /sIxkp4Zx/tfmJoBoeYP7RAvz3vNIE8nAoL2mcjPiAaZSQMZCkVwI55IOuQ7Wp6S z4oVRE8oU1EF0/20Aa1NpA== =txCx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----