Bug#1125411: Info received (Bug#1125411: tech-ctte: Unbound resolvconf hook default breaks recursive resolution)

Support LRob <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Feb 2026 15:57:58 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte
Message-ID <9931ea78-d567-4146-b9a0-bbce82aedba1__21062.8530288645$1770303688$gmane$org@lrob.fr>
Thank you Matthew for your perspective.

Regarding your two conditions:

1) Broader discussion

I agree this is needed. I note that some of the committee's deliberation 
happened privately, which may have limited the range of perspectives 
considered so far. Would it be possible to move the remaining discussion 
to a public venue to gather wider input?

2) Explicit maintainer statement

In the original bug #1124968, Michael wrote:

 > I wont argue any more here, there's no point.
 > If you feel the default [...] should be changed, please ask the 
security team or a technical committee.

This read as a clear refusal to act. However, Michael's subsequent 
message in this thread (#17) concluded that "unbound should not enable 
the resolvconf hook by default," aligning with my position. His current 
stance is therefore unclear, and I think hearing from him directly would 
help everyone.

Michael, could you clarify your current position?

One additional point

I'd like to raise a question I haven't seen addressed: what was the 
original justification for enabling this hook by default? The script 
itself notes it was disabled for several releases before being 
re-enabled. If there was no broad user demand for this change, while 
introducing the privacy and security concerns discussed here, that would 
be a strong argument for reverting to the previous default.

I hear Matthew's point about collaboration, and I appreciate the 
committee's time on this. I'll keep my contributions constructive going 
forward.

LRob