Bug#1125411: tech-ctte: Unbound resolvconf hook default breaks recursive resolution

Support LRob <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Feb 2026 19:39:40 +0100
Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte
Message-ID	<f72450ed-bb07-4dcc-8364-9283b23b0e0a__33069.0692573384$1770316887$gmane$org@lrob.fr>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------OKAf5yC00Up1dUhMbxgADLyG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thank you Russ for your sharp attention and for the clarification. 
Rereading message #17 with that framing, I see your point: Michael was 
most likely articulating my position, not adopting it. I appreciate the 
correction.

That said, a direct confirmation from Michael would still help establish 
where things stand, since his position is central to Matthew's second 
condition.

On a broader note: I've raised privacy and security concerns several 
times in this thread, but I haven't seen them directly addressed, except 
perhaps by Matthew, who expressed sympathy for my position. I'd 
genuinely like to understand how the committee weighs these against 
other considerations. Is there a shared framework for evaluating such 
tradeoffs in Debian?

I'm also wondering whether I initially directed this to the right place, 
given that my primary concern is security rather than a purely technical 
disagreement.

LRob

--------------OKAf5yC00Up1dUhMbxgADLyG
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p
class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Thank
      you Russ for your sharp attention and for the clarification.
      Rereading message #17 with that framing, I see your point: Michael
      was most likely articulating my position, not adopting it. I
      appreciate the correction.</p>
    <p
class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">That
      said, a direct confirmation from Michael would still help
      establish where things stand, since his position is central to
      Matthew's second condition.</p>
    <p
class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On
      a broader note: I've raised privacy and security concerns several
      times in this thread, but I haven't seen them directly addressed,
      except perhaps by Matthew, who expressed sympathy for my position.
      I'd genuinely like to understand how the committee weighs these
      against other considerations. Is there a shared framework for
      evaluating such tradeoffs in Debian?</p>
    <p
class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">I'm
      also wondering whether I initially directed this to the right
      place, given that my primary concern is security rather than a
      purely technical disagreement.</p>
    <p
class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">LRob</p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------OKAf5yC00Up1dUhMbxgADLyG--