Bug#1079800: release-notes - Document that default ppc64el kernel switched to 4k pages
Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <fd0fad1e-3283-4194-86e2-6f9082d58474__26394.976773166$1749794485$gmane$org@debian.org> |
Hi, On 13-06-2025 00:19, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 12/06/2025 at 13:32, Paul Gevers wrote: >> I also forgot about this bug when I upgraded the ppc64el host of >> ci.d.n last week (or the week before) and didn't do anything special. >> How can I see where things go wrong? > > Do you mean before or after rebooting with the new kernel and page size? I meant after. I for some/most systems nothing needs to be done, we should word this text in a different way than if my example system is now also broken but I just hadn't spotted it yet. > Before, you can check if the system uses any btrfs filesystems and their > sector size as indicated in the bug report. No btrfs here. Things are on ext4. Should we mention ext4 is fine as it's the default in Debian IIRC. (Is it always?) > After, you can check all > filesystem mounts and swap activations defined in /etc/fstab, native > systemd units or any othe means. Both / and swap are working. Should we advice this for people that stumble over these notes after they upgraded and want to be sure? Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 585 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsC7BAABCABvBYJoS74LCRCcXJnrBb11CkcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9u cy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmeyTb73fszEZXt80RijWqDhdC7pQRpQxoTabEYXMcSI phYhBFi2bUhza+k7BS3mcpxcmesFvXUKAAB5wQf/SaMFcM8Gb+GZilq+BUwrCtqf VzfemTrXNo79XYk0nTcmrKErumHRhjB6t64OrzSkEv0nfAgo3xUqAUlHQfNyKxJ5 lHFLwYvqc81e42Ju//uDUgODdtM2s9/5QjrDOthYVpisHQgk3QKJHB0Ifa3ebQls crjlUxyAqcy4oGoldU0QmOFln2y00c1G2A9qFz3m9TJagAyPHHJUw8zDVOuf64ev LPk/pGTtrTx22J0H9/lOvpQMkGZZ3WVyJLxlY+3JjWHcqM70nqypAQRGuCOUNuog PXDrlqIy0G6Puhly3qszYlpK4A+Qd0NMR6li0Xg2ZimyPRbcvHtD4k6SfwuF4g== =85Hp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----