Bug#1074346: Trixie and later on i386 will no longer support UEFI Secure Boot

Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation
Message-ID <aFKPg__njbHkXbhZ__6082.14739929593$1750241248$gmane$org@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 21:36:19 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>We need to document that i386 Secure Boot is no longer supported. We
>no longer have signed kernels, and we no longer have a signed
>shim. Signed GRUB and fwupd-efi packages will also be removed soon.

This has mostly been overtaken by events: we no longer have *unsigned* 
kernels for i386 either, or an installer.

<https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/release-notes/issues.en.html#reduced-support-for-i386> 
describes the reduced support for i386 in more detail, and I think 
"there is no Secure Boot" doesn't need saying explicitly when we are 
already effectively saying "you can't boot it" :-)

(https://bugs.debian.org/1107976 is a related request for better wording 
about this in the introduction.)

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 12:16:06 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>Might want to note this on amd64 as well, for those
>64-bit systems with 32-bit EFI.

I think this is the only thing that might possibly benefit from 
documenting separately - although as Steve said, amd64 systems with 
32-bit EFI are rare, so perhaps it isn't worth it.

     smcv
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.