Bug#1105027: Document that Rust packages require SSE2 on i386
Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aFKR_AhhF2Pt4KTS__6284.17942659638$1750241975$gmane$org@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk> |
Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/261
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sat, 10 May 2025 at 11:56:46 +0200, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
>On Sat, 10 May 2025 08:51:15 +0000 Holger Levsen wrote:
>> I'm reassigning this to release-notes as this needs to be documented
>> for the trixie release. Leaving some context too, but please read the full
>> bug.
>
>As I mentioned on #-release:
>
>I think we should just document that the baseline on i386 now requires
>SSE2 instead of limiting the statement to selected packages. If apt
>requires SSE2 indirectly, it doesn't matter to most users that
>technically it is only sqv.
For what it's worth, I agree.
Even if there was a supportable way to make apt on i386 use some
gpgv-based signature verification in preference to sqv, if our official
documentation slightly over-states the requirement, it will make the
message clearer to the non-experts who need to see this in the
documentation; similar to the way we make sure to say that skipping a
release is unsupported, even though a Debian expert can often make it
work (at their own risk, and perhaps not in the case of trixie).
I've proposed
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/261 to
explicitly call out a semi-modern CPU as being required for i386's
remaining use-cases.
On Sat, 10 May 2025 at 12:17:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>i386 is not supported for upgrades. i386 is only supported to be used
>as multi-arch or in a i386 chroot (on otherwise more powerful
>hardware).
>
>See https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/171
(which was subsequently merged, and my MR adds to it)
smcv