Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel?

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:45:33AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> it looks like enabling this flag on armel/armhf is a little bit premature.
> 
> Apparently it's not completely supported upstream, and might cause
> regressions, according to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522678
> 
> Is that a feature that the Debian ARM32 porters and the security team really
> want to support actively, despite the missing upstream support?
> 
> In Ubuntu, people tracked down segfaults due to this change in at least
> valgrind and gnutls, maybe more.

It's 1.5 months later, valgrind is still failing and apt in valgrind
hence segfaults. I am disabling the apt valgrind test on armhf in 2.7.8,
but this situation is somewhat untenable.

I did clone the bug to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060251
now.