Re: Bug#1061111: RFS: dpkg-buildenv/1.0.0 [ITP] -- Builds debian packages in a docker container.
David Kalnischkies <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <e6jgyeozagwksrmoc5hbsp52jufxj63ixtmjpk5d5z27ibunkx@2mtu4eqb2yf3> |
Hi, On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:35:40PM +0000, Aidan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dpkg-buildenv": Similar to my recent "veto" of apt-verify in #1059267, which was subsequently ignored and pushed into the archive anyhow, I would like to call into question the naming of the package/application… There are various "dpkg-build*" tools already that grabbing 'env' feels wrong (I would confuse it probably with 'flag' on a bad day), especially if that isn't at least discussed with dpkg maintainers (I at least see no mention of it on the list) and given that this is something that "just" works with Docker. As explained in the other bug, there is no veto and as you can see its easy to completely ignore me (and anyone else) but I wanted to say it anyhow, so that nobody is surprised later on. Best regards David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE5sn+Q4uCja/tn0GrMRvlz3HQeIMFAmWpbh4ACgkQMRvlz3HQ eIOlthAAp+sPHQS19W2AA3IqG1MtkqZOmBoA4rm48OXFU7W8+AAufQjHWs2+Tvk3 +x9N1WX5/33/dV3SrZKYQRhtoCulHYhWckRNo2Z0xBImRxFxDA05b1B0oHoYKCzm j/H+4WsO+XAFGNp03Ar7+KdQdE7yJ/eXQAW4g9cWca1VOJoRwGUa7TSsV8FclWz7 8RsO/FUjBa3R66j0BUo3/sPkizhzF9fzUB/wsNgDu7T/n4CVpYB9A9eRGMffeabc bHRUE/6mxWkvAmDFDE1w7MNyZvXZNfHUtAheTX8ldKVSEOaNu6CLM4anp+43Bgpu fgic5JFl4i/NxW19zC/jCzsnh4ccGtVErrjXnGj7PBA/4oNdwSREzT+RB/geq8Qt Krsemo1zDROnUHq2wUKWR3fiXd/L6lKispHXeDLzCn1WnSo60hd2hOZRB7Dzhh/D UxSGC6vdvZF0n49mIav8QvrlFspb0fFbxoiiQ0ZjAghOYGG69gnZWNGwZwPoanUf wkNhdXcngROuGdznEkZ53F512Qab2jdXC9G/acye1Oq1qoGBLONodnvLJz2Wfvlw WdSuwsukwz/JrCLj88cymOTOs3ys6hA5QfuzOLyl7w1wnHUS5qSsuxY7LAR/zlss UjpicGsz75YaalQXGri0kwz0cRqcKE47u3MHHbS2NfH3jmYvpeg= =LMz2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----