Re: [01/05] Embedded with systemd: systemd and SIL

Jean-Christian de Rivaz <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:12:56 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded,gmane.linux.debian.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 16. 11. 14 19:52, Robert a écrit :
> By choosing packages carefully, it is possible to use linux in
> applications that need to meet SIL1 or SIL2 criteria [1]. I personally
> don't have any applications that need to meet SIL2, but it is possible
> to meet SIL1 by taking a normal installation and removing a bunch of
> stuff (initramfs, udev and inetd amongst others) until the system is
> deterministic enough (see the methodology in [2]). /sbin/init functions
> OK with a few static devices in/dev
>
> Given the tight udev/systemd marriage and the undeterministic nature of
> socket activation, I suspect that systemd will never be suitable for
> SIL applications.

Why did you think that localhost sockets activation is not deterministic ?
When local process use localhost sockets, there is no transmission media 
with
risk of packet loss, alteration, random latency, or reordering.

AFAIK, dbus is designed to never loss a message under normal workload. 
Future
kdbus will probably be even better on that matter.

JCdR



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]