Re: [01/05] Embedded with systemd: systemd and SIL
Jean-Christian de Rivaz <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:12:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded,gmane.linux.debian.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 16. 11. 14 19:52, Robert a écrit : > By choosing packages carefully, it is possible to use linux in > applications that need to meet SIL1 or SIL2 criteria [1]. I personally > don't have any applications that need to meet SIL2, but it is possible > to meet SIL1 by taking a normal installation and removing a bunch of > stuff (initramfs, udev and inetd amongst others) until the system is > deterministic enough (see the methodology in [2]). /sbin/init functions > OK with a few static devices in/dev > > Given the tight udev/systemd marriage and the undeterministic nature of > socket activation, I suspect that systemd will never be suitable for > SIL applications. Why did you think that localhost sockets activation is not deterministic ? When local process use localhost sockets, there is no transmission media with risk of packet loss, alteration, random latency, or reordering. AFAIK, dbus is designed to never loss a message under normal workload. Future kdbus will probably be even better on that matter. JCdR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]