Re: [04/05] Embedded with systemd: systemd and kernel upgrades

Jean-Christian de Rivaz <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:45:22 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 16. 11. 14 19:52, Robert a écrit :
> This was recently posted on #systemd-devel:
>
> "To make this clear, we expect that systemd and kernels are updated in
> lockstep. We explicitly do not support really old kernels with really
> new systemd. So far we had the focus to support up to 2y old kernels
> (which means 3.4 right now), but even that should be taken with a grain
> of salt, as we already made clear that soon after kdbus is merged into
> the kernel we'll probably make a hard requirement on it from the systemd
> side."
>
> This is a very onerous requirement in the embedded world. There are many
> embedded platforms sold today that only have 2.6.X BSPs. While I agree
> that the BSP from vendors should be better (and it is getting better
> thanks to devicetree), it seems that we are doomed to run ancient
> userspace to match our ancient kernels.
If you take the risk to rely exclusively on a vendor BSP, take your 
responsibility and don't blame others for your poor choice. Most today 
SoC vendors understand that there must upload there patches to mainline 
kernel and do it routinely. This means that while some vendors still 
offer BSP (because there have clients asking for it), last mainline 
kernel run as well just fine on there SoC.
> This change will probably hit me the hardest and for me it really cuts
> into what linux means. It used to be that I could run the same userspace
> on my tiny embedded device, my desktop or on the server --- the only
> difference being the kernel.
Why did you not try to run the last mainline kernel for your SoC instead 
of an outdated BSP ? This will immediately solve your problem.
> It seems like the only solution here is to abandon debian and fall back
> to OpenEmbedded or buildroot.

Fell free to try it all. I have do that since many years and found that 
the Jessie armhf port is actually vastly superior to anything out there.

Regards,

JCdR


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]