Re: Bug#1135532: pygame: consider switching to pygame-ce fork as upstream for src:pygame
Vincent Cheng <[email protected]> Sat, 2 May 2026 12:45:03 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.games |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACZd_tD8q4K6dJzLtCDPqGSen13o8ivXQg=oeXyxxRQcebQhEg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, May 2, 2026 at 2:56=E2=80=AFAM Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wro= te: > > Source: pygame > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > pygame seems to have had governance issues that led to a fork (pygame-ce)= , > and the original pygame doesn't seem to be keeping up well with > behaviour changes to private implementation details of SDL2/sdl2-compat > (for example the patch for #1123947 hasn't been applied upstream, and > there's also #1135448). Perhaps Debian should migrate to pygame-ce as > the upstream for our src:pygame package? See #1042567 for my opinion as pygame maintainer. I'm also unsure at this point how far pygame-ce has diverged from pygame, and whether migrating to -ce is compatible with the existing pygame-based games in the archive (and I suspect that many of those pygame games are dead upstream so that's even more work for us). Regards, Vincent