Re: Question regarding Trixie and SFML

On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 at 10:55:09 +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
>I'm going to talk about SFML and not CSFML which is the C binding to
>SFML (related but not the same library).

Sorry, I'd missed the distinction between these two layers.

Presumably the same things that have been said about SFML apply more or 
less equally to CSFML: it's a new major version, and you have chosen to 
make it replace the old major version (like OpenSSL) rather than being a 
separate package (like FLTK)?

     smcv