Re: Question regarding Trixie and SFML

Hi,

On 02/06/2025 11:31, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 at 10:55:09 +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
>> I'm going to talk about SFML and not CSFML which is the C binding to
>> SFML (related but not the same library).
> 
> Sorry, I'd missed the distinction between these two layers.
> 
> Presumably the same things that have been said about SFML apply more or
> less equally to CSFML: it's a new major version, and you have chosen to
> make it replace the old major version (like OpenSSL) rather than being a
> separate package (like FLTK)?

Yes everything is the same for CSFML.

James