Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 27, Mechtilde Stehmann <[email protected]> wrote: >The issue at hand is the inclusion of additional license texts in the >base-files package. I think that there was a consensus back then and there is still one now. Do you volunteer to NMU base-files, if the maintainer is not interested in working on this? On Apr 27, Andrea Pappacoda <[email protected]> wrote: >Maybe it'd make sense to restrict this to licenses which also included >in Essential packages, or ones with an high enough priority (like >Important), so that extra disk usage for base-files. is less of a >concern. The list of licenses to be added is small enough that this should not be a concern. But maybe you have different data? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQQnKUXNg20437dCfobLPsM64d7XgQUCae9cGQAKCRDLPsM64d7X gVdbAP0fJ3JnFUJheKhbEPb3aZYAA9sKUmDsnhEUKnj+9xHbxwD/UKmqiqC62vg4 L75ElLF/r80tg57jeWvSdEEdPN8xmQM= =23tD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----